Thank LuanRT #36

Merged
fynngodau merged 3 commits from thanks into main 2025-02-20 21:44:18 +01:00
Owner

per 5th plenum

per 5th plenum
fynngodau added 2 commits 2025-02-19 15:35:04 +01:00
Thanks LuanRT
All checks were successful
Build and publish Docker image / build (push) Successful in 20s
Build and publish Docker image / build (pull_request) Successful in 17s
5004f3de03
Stypox requested changes 2025-02-19 15:52:59 +01:00
Stypox left a comment
Owner

Thanks!

Thanks!
@ -0,0 +49,4 @@
<h2>Blog posts</h2>
</header>
<ul class="link-list">
<li><strong><a href="./2025-02-20_thanks_luanrt.html">Thanking LuanRT</a></strong></li>
Owner

Why is this not also "Thank you, LuanRT!"?

Why is this not also "Thank you, LuanRT!"?
Author
Owner

I was thinking the sidebar space is very tight (and easier to scan without exclamation marks), but in this case the difference in chars is not actually as large as I thought 🙂

I was thinking the sidebar space is very tight (and easier to scan without exclamation marks), but in this case the difference in chars is not actually as large as I thought 🙂
Owner

The exclamation mark distraction makes sense, then keep it as it is

The exclamation mark distraction makes sense, then keep it as it is
Stypox marked this conversation as resolved
@ -0,0 +75,4 @@
<h3>20.02.2025</h3>
</header>
<p>
We would like to express our gratitude to <a href="https://thatsciencephile.com/">LuanRT</a>, "a space nerd, programmer, and hobbyist astrophotographer from Brazil". LuanRT made a significant effort to research the technical mechanisms at work, which they made public on their <a href="https://github.com/LuanRT/BgUtils/"><code>BgUtils</code> repository on GitHub</a>. This documentation and their active participation in internal communication channels have been extremely helpful when working on the latest version of NewPipe, <a href="https://github.com/TeamNewPipe/NewPipe/releases/tag/v0.27.6">v0.27.6</a> (blog post pending), which contains an implementation that benefits much from their work.
Owner

...made a significant effort to research the technical mechanisms at work YouTube's integrity checks

...made a significant effort to research ~the technical mechanisms at work~ YouTube's integrity checks
Owner

lgtm now

lgtm now
Stypox marked this conversation as resolved
@ -0,0 +78,4 @@
We would like to express our gratitude to <a href="https://thatsciencephile.com/">LuanRT</a>, "a space nerd, programmer, and hobbyist astrophotographer from Brazil". LuanRT made a significant effort to research the technical mechanisms at work, which they made public on their <a href="https://github.com/LuanRT/BgUtils/"><code>BgUtils</code> repository on GitHub</a>. This documentation and their active participation in internal communication channels have been extremely helpful when working on the latest version of NewPipe, <a href="https://github.com/TeamNewPipe/NewPipe/releases/tag/v0.27.6">v0.27.6</a> (blog post pending), which contains an implementation that benefits much from their work.
</p>
<p>
In recognition of these contributions, NewPipe e.V.'s <a href="./2025-02-08_5th_plenum.html">5th assembly</a> decided to provide LuanRT with a small financial contribution, as a humble token of appreciation, in the name of TeamNewPipe and all of NewPipe's users. We encourage you to do the same independently of us, through <a href="https://github.com/sponsors/LuanRT/">GitHub sponsors</a> or through <a href="https://ko-fi.com/luanrt">their Ko-Fi page</a>.
Owner

"through their GitHub sponsor or their Ko-Fi page" instead of "through GitHub sponsor or through their Ko-Fi page"

"through their GitHub sponsor or their Ko-Fi page" instead of "through GitHub sponsor or through their Ko-Fi page"
Stypox marked this conversation as resolved
fynngodau added 1 commit 2025-02-19 16:01:54 +01:00
Apply review
Some checks failed
Build and publish Docker image / build (pull_request) Successful in 18s
Build and publish Docker image / build (push) Failing after 17s
0c7971404b
fynngodau merged commit 0c7971404b into main 2025-02-20 21:44:18 +01:00
fynngodau deleted branch thanks 2025-02-20 21:44:19 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: NewPipe-eV/website#36
No description provided.